Simulating a transaction is a powerful feature that allows you to validate whether a given transaction meets its requirements without modifying the blockchain. It's a safe way to ensure that a transaction will behave as expected without spending any real resources.
You can use the simulate()
method to test your transactions:
const { gasUsed } = await contract.functions
.transfer(amountToTransfer, assetId, someAddress)
.callParams({
forward: [amountToForward, BaseAssetId],
})
.txParams({ gasPrice: 1, gasLimit: 10_000 })
.simulate();
console.log('The gas used on this call was: ', gasUsed')
Simulating a transaction allows you to catch potential errors or issues before submitting the real transaction, making it a valuable tool for development and user interaction.
simulate()
When interacting with a contract, you might want to execute a method that does not change the state of the blockchain—for example, reading a value from storage without modifying it.
In such cases, you can use the simulate()
method:
const { value } = await contract.functions
.echo_u8(15)
.txParams({ gasLimit: 10_000 })
.simulate();
Using simulate()
for read-only calls or to test transactions provides a way to safely and efficiently access information from the blockchain or validate how a transaction would behave. It ensures that no changes will be made to the blockchain and no resources will be spent, making it a valuable tool for data retrieval and development.
simulate()
vs call()
simulate()
: Suitable for both read-only calls and testing transactions that could modify the blockchain's state, this method allows you to safely validate how functions will behave without making changes. It's a robust validation, development, and data retrieval utility method, providing confidence in your transactions and interactions with the blockchain.
call()
: Use this method when calling a function that modifies the blockchain's state, such as transferring funds or updating values. Remember that if you use call()
on a contract method that changes the blockchain state, it will spend your resources.
It is worth noting that while call()
can be used to execute read-only contract methods without spending resources, it's recommended to use simulate()
for such calls. Using simulate()
guarantees that no resources will be spent even if you accidentally execute a contract method that would typically change the blockchain. This additional safeguard makes simulate()
preferable for read-only interactions.
Note: Although a
simulate()
call won't modify the blockchain's state and does not spend resources, the transaction must still meet its requirements to be considered valid.